Barbara Hughes: Save the cranes

I’m writing in response to the editorial in Sunday’s Steamboat Pilot & Today (“Our View: Cranes in the crosshairs”) regarding the proposal to allow a hunting season on sandhill cranes. I find it irresponsible of the editorial board to take a stand on an issue without fully researching it. Statistics can be manipulated to support any argument. Most of us know that it happens in corporate America on a regular basis.

Statistics are not science. The fact that 1,279 cranes were counted in 2011, up from 698 the year before, should not be used as justification for a hunt here. If conditions are favorable, cranes lay one or two eggs per year. Of those, typically only one colt (crane chick) survives long enough to migrate with the flock in the fall. For their numbers to almost double in one year, one would have to assume that every crane counted in 2010 was part of a breeding pair (5 to 7 years old) that successfully raised two colts in one of the worst nesting seasons in recent memory. These numbers just don’t make any sense.

The last nesting survey was performed in 2005, so no one really knows how many cranes of breeding age are in the Rocky Mountain population. The numbers presented in the issue paper were based on annual surveys performed in a limited area and did not make any reference to seasonal weather conditions such as drought, extreme heat or cold, flooding or winter snowpack. Trends in short-term studies have no statistical significance. This is not science and leads me to question how the justification for a hunt in Northwest Colorado can be based on these numbers.

Aside from the numbers game, I think that public sentiment needs to be taken very seriously. In just two weeks, more than 1,500 citizens have signed a petition asking the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission to maintain the current state regulations that prohibit the hunting of cranes in Northwest Colorado. Comments have come in from across the state and across the country. Just as penguins and polar bears have become the “poster children” in a campaign to raise awareness of climate change, so too can cranes become the symbols of eco-tourism for Colorado. Colorado state parks are full of informational signs that include cranes as part of the wildlife watching experience here. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s survey, published in 2006, indicated that wildlife watchers outnumbered hunters by 7 to 1 and brought three times the amount of revenue to the state.

The ability of cranes to evoke strong emotional responses from people all across the world is just part of what makes them so special. Cranes have existed for millions of years without the need for humans to “manage” their populations. There certainly isn’t an overpopulation problem in the Rocky Mountain region. Loss of wetland habitats and hunting in other states already is putting pressure on the birds. Do we really want to add more stress by allowing them to be hunted as they migrate through our beautiful state? This is the only part of their range where they can roost, breed and migrate in peace. Today, 11 of 15 crane species throughout the world are threatened with extinction. Doesn’t that make it even more important to try to protect what we have here in Colorado?

I hope that we can all learn something from these peaceful, ancient birds. It is arrogant for humans to think that every species in the world is there to serve mankind and that our science is better than Mother Nature’s. I want my grandchildren to be able to enjoy the sound of the cranes’ ethereal calls as they fly overhead. If you feel the same way, write to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission at 6060 Broadway, Denver, CO 80216; email

CPWCommission@state.co.us; or sign the online petition at www.tinyurl.com/savethecranes.

Barbara Hughes

Steamboat Springs

Community comments

Note: The Steamboat Pilot & Today doesn’t necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy.

(Verleen Tucker) aspenwood_777 says...

Barbara, thank you for writing this letter to the editor and sharing the correct link to the petition I signed the petition and shared the information on facebook. I look forward to the day when the DOW realizes that the lives of animals and birds do not belong to the DOW or anybody else. They belong to the animals and birds and should never be for sale.

Posted 2 May 2012, 8:08 p.m. Suggest removal

(rhys jones) highwaystar says...

Yeah, get 'em while you can. Species disappear from this Earth faster than we can catalog them, even without our capable assistance. They say birds are our closest connection with dinosaurs, so this ancient variety must be interesting, and why do they call their young "colts"?

Barbara makes a good point: Cranes are not a nuisance. The next time a crane obliterates my grill, I will support their hunting, much as I do deer and elk now, overgrown rats with antlers that they are. Never mind the drunk Texans it takes to help clear them out. We've got real sportsmen here.

Posted 3 May 2012, 12:19 a.m. Suggest removal

(mark hartless) markhartless says...

The author is right. Statistics can be twisted to say anything, and they are.
I'm also glad the climate change issue came up. There is a perfect example of how we can have "global warming" while statistics tell us temperatures are going down.

I also wonder if the author knows that polar bears, "poster children... of climate change" as she calls them, are hunted and killed regularly.

As someone who would NEVER EVER want to kill one of these birds I have to say I am somewhat saddened by the thought of it.

My main point, however, would be that since the number of birds killed will not change the issue seems to be whether or not the local human population can stomach the sight of it or whether, like so many, many things, our advanced, modern society simply can't handle truth up close and personal.

Posted 3 May 2012, 2:30 p.m. Suggest removal

(mark hartless) markhartless says...

I must oftentimes just complety miss my target. (no pun intended)
I am very much aware of peoples wants.
Some want to take my guns, others want to take my money, others want me dead, and so on.

Whenever I told her what I wanted, my grandmother used to reply "people in Hell want ice-water".

As a libertarian who is more than capable of understanding the 2nd ammendment, I am not the least bit interested in killing cranes and the thought of it saddens me.
HOWEVER...
I was very careful not to say I was against YOU killing cranes or against YOU having guns. By all means, go for it.
I appreciate your position more than I think you realize Tom but you err in 2 ways; insinuating that I would presume to infringe on ANY of your rights, ammendments 1-10 or otherwise, and to suggest that the crowd you are referring to is in any way, shape or form, "fooling" me.

Posted 3 May 2012, 7:43 p.m. Suggest removal

(jerry carlton) jlc says...

Tom Really liked your quotes from the Bible but I would suspect Barbara is New Age or Budhist. I used to hunt ducks but am too old and lazy and no longer have a retriever. Loved to watch that dog work. The government will take my guns from my cold dead hands after they kill me if it ever comes to that.

Posted 4 May 2012, 5:31 p.m. Suggest removal

(mark hartless) markhartless says...

No Tom.
For some reason the goose or duck doesn't sadden me as much.
I have seen a lot of killing and I just don't like killing anything anymore, and cranes seem special.
I know that is not a logical position and I would never make the claim, as some have, that emotion is a satisfactory foundation for this decision.

I agree that Wildlife people get it right most times and they should make the decision having the best interests of the birds in mind.

This emotion-based clap-trap is exactly what gave us dead pine trees from New Mexico to Canada.

I would only add a word of thanks to you Tom for having the courage to speak to this issue in the face of so much unfounded and overly emotional hostility which has become so commonplace. The silent majority needs to speak up more often.

Posted 4 May 2012, 7:16 p.m. Suggest removal

Post a comment (Requires free registration)

Posting comments requires a free account and verification.